SUA Breaking News »ISIS Beheads Steven Sotloff as a ‘Second Message’ to USA

Islamists and the White House – Foreign policy drivers

By Denise Simon

The strange relationships at the White House are starting to reveal some very disturbing trends, especially involving our foreign policy and homeland security. People may believe the ‘Religion of Peace’ players on Capitol Hill are to be brought into the fold to promote better relations, but appears it already has, but not for the good.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has long employed, as her Chief of Staff; Huma Abedin, a Muslim. Huma has been with Hillary Clinton since 1996 and is married to the outed sex twitterer, and former Congressman Anthony Weiner; they just had a baby. Ironically, it was Bill Clinton who presided over the marriage of Huma and Anthony.

Sec. of State Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin

Hillary Clinton, in her position as America’s number one diplomat, is the driver of all geo-political matters concerning the US which includes activities involving weapons, terror networks, military/drone missions, and monetary transactions. So as Chief of Staff, Huma has complete access to all confidential and top secret intelligence.

Dr. Abdullah Omar Naseef - President of the Muslim World Congress

What is disturbing about her access is that she has deep family ties and likely holds a membership card herself in the Muslim Brotherhood.

Huma’s mother is an active member of the Sisterhood of the Muslim Brotherhood and Huma’s brother Hassan has deep connections with Dr. Abdullah Omar Naseef, President of the World Muslim Congress. and Sheik Yusuf al Qaradawi. (See below)

Additionally, Huma was instrumental in ensuring that Ali Mohamed, the famous character who fooled the military and others for years, was not court-martialed as a member of Al Qaeda. He was at one time a member of our own U.S. Special forces as well as being a member of the Egyptian army.

We also know we have Muslim Brotherhood operatives within the White House and the policies of the US government have been quite generous to all objectives in the mission playbook of the Muslim Brotherhood including the Ground Zero mosque, in Anthony Weiner’s old district. It also appears that this influence also helped develop US foreign policy in the ‘Arab Spring’.

Further proof lies in the impact they are having internally. Witness the training program on Islam within the U.S. military, and sensitivity training for the FBI.

Download the PDF of the Army manual for Islam Sensitivity here.

This picture is painting itself. A most frightening and certainly anti-American mural.

This set of relationships also begs the following questions:

Hussam Ayloush and Qaradawi

  1. Who is vetting these people, and how does Huma get that level of clearance?
  2. What is the bottom line agenda of the White House and State Department?
  3. Is Hillary Clinton really presidential material as the DNC is touting?
  4. What will 2012 really bring to America relating to our National Security?

Now we have Sheik Yusuf al Qaradawi – US Mediator to the Taliban talks?

It has also become common knowledge that the White House and the State Department have been in serious talks with the Taliban to come to some agreement where the U.S. which allows and endorses the Taliban as a legitimate political entity while getting the nod of approval to open a headquarters in Qatar.

Now the White House needed a negotiator that was acceptable to the Taliban. So Obama has openly recruited one of these associations, as our mediator with the Taliban. It is almost too hard to believe that this man, Qaradawi, an avowed promoter of terrorism is to be trusted as a negotiator - for the USA! The White House and the State Department are turning our security on its ear. Talk about ‘fundamental change’.

Andrew McCarthy gives us some background on this character, and he has written extensively about him:

For those who may be unfamiliar with him, he is the most influential Sunni Islamist in the world, thanks to such ventures as his al-Jazeera TV program (Sharia and Life) and website (IslamOnline.net).

In 2003, he issued a fatwa calling for the killing of American troops in Iraq. As he put it,

Those killed fighting the American forces are martyrs given their good intentions since they consider these invading troops an enemy within their territories but without their will. . . . Although they are seen by some as being wrong, those defending against attempts to control Islamic countries have the intention of jihad and bear a spirit of the defense of their homeland.

The Investigative Project on Terrorism tells us the following as well:

Hussam Ayloush, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations‘ Los Angeles chapter, has said he “cannot think of one Muslim scholar that I know of, that I have ever heard of, who has actually condoned terrorism.” Ayloush added that there “is no debate actually within the Muslim world. There is no scholar who says otherwise.”

That’s odd, since he posed for a photograph with one (at right). Prominent Muslim Brotherhood theologian Yusuf al-Qaradawi has a long history of advocating terrorism and violence, which includes praising Nazi persecution of Jews and expressing hope that he could die a martyr killing them.

Qaradawi’s extremism has been a topic of discussion for U.S. diplomats and their foreign counterparts, cables just made public by Wikileaks show.

Even stranger timing

At the same time, a new development emerges where commanders within the Taliban and al Qaeda are in talks with Pakistan to take on American forces in Afghanistan. Once again, is Pakistan a friend or foe?

Also at the same time, there are meetings underway to trade Taliban prisoners or merely give them up. This may relieve some political pressure from the left, and open space at Guantanamo. But in exchange for what? To facilitate the end our efforts in Afghanistan early?

Back and forth, coddling strange bedfellows, maintaining and developing even stranger ties, and easing the infiltration of the federal government. Is this what Obama and Clinton are doing…?

Foreign policy in the hands of Obama, Hillary Clinton, Leon Panetta, and Huma Abedin…seems Islamists have a firm grip.

Edited by Scott W. Winchell

Shortlink:

Posted by on January 2, 2012. Filed under Politics-DC. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

2 Responses to Islamists and the White House – Foreign policy drivers

  1. Every one of them are committing treason. Do they know the penalty for this? Seems,we have quite a few on this list,including past living Presidents.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>