SUA Breaking News »Mourning the Loss of a Great Soldier

New Executive Order signed – why now? Benghazi…election?

Editor’s Note – With so much evidence emerging that is exposing the administration as hiding so much, is it a stretch to think something nefarious, much more deleterious to the homeland is coming? Is the failing re-election campaign pointing in this direction as well? If he is re-elected, will the be impeachment proceedings?

All of these aspects make us wonder, and you of course are the judge. Please read the following compiled of several articles others have put together and the many we have already reported upon here at SUA. Don’t you want to see the videos from the compound, the drones, the rest of the compilation of building evidence?

Is Obama’s Response to the Blistering Benghazi Update a New Executive Order?

By Situation Brief

Earlier today Fox News broke out an update on the events that transpired in and around Benghazi on September 11, 2012. In that update came information that the White House administration knew what was happening on the ground, in real time. Perhaps the most damning information is that help was requested three (3) times and that there was military capable of helping Ambassador Chris Stevens, Information Specialist Sean Smith, former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods, and former Navy SEAL Glen Doherty (who flew in from Tripoli to lend aid), but all requests were denied and those offering help were told to “stand down”.

Given the immediate attention to the breaking news throughout the day today, and as is par for Washington when they do not wish to have an immediate response of their actions given, the White House issued a new executive order around 4:00 pm ET.

 

Read the Executive Order here on the White House web site.

Obama signs new Executive Order expanding Homeland Security mission in the U.S.

By Kenneth Schortgen, Jr. – Examiner

On Oct. 26, President Obama signed a new Executive Order which expands the role and scope of Homeland Security in states and areas across the country. This order, which establishes a new Security Partnership Council, will have far reaching effects in the overall mission of Homeland Security, and for state and local areas that interact with the Federal agency.

Economically, the Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council Executive Order will increase funding and resources to state and local governments to fulfill Homeland Security programs and doctrines, as well as increase Federal oversight in the implementation of directives tied to the agencies mission.

The purpose of this order is to maximize the Federal Government’s ability to develop local partnerships in the United States to support homeland security priorities. Partnerships are collaborative working relationships in which the goals, structure, and roles and responsibilities of the relationships are mutually determined.

There is established a White House Homeland Security Partnership Council (Council) to foster local partnerships — between the Federal Government and the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, community-based organizations, and State, local, tribal, and territorial government and law enforcement – to address homeland security challenges.

Sec. 3. Mission and Function of the Council and Steering Committee

(ii) promote homeland security priorities and opportunities for collaboration between Federal Government field offices and State, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders;

(iii) advise and confer with State, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders and agencies interested in expanding or building local homeland security partnerships; - Whitehouse.gov

Since it’s creation in 2001 from the aftermath of 9/11, the Department of Homeland Security has expanded its authority over states, communities, and law enforcement each year. From expanding TSA responsibilities over airport transportation to now include trains, subways, and even highway checkpoints, to new regulations in how border control agents function in immigration conflicts, Homeland Security is one of the fastest growing government agencies in the past decade.

Through creating a new Steering Committee in partnership with how Homeland Security missions, directives, and programs are implemented in state and local levels, the fine line between state sovereignty and the need protect the country from disaster and terror attacks is becoming smaller every day. Over the past few years Homeland Security grants to local law enforcement have led to a militarization of police and public safety, and new drone technology is being used in criminal investigations outside the scope of national security.

In a little more than a decade, the Department of Homeland Security, in conjunction with its underlying and partnering Federal agencies, have infiltrated nearly every community in America. This new Executive Order, which expands the scope of the agency and gives it greater power in state and local partnerships, will mean greater loss of freedoms and liberties to both the states and citizens as the Federal government imposes greater authority over what should remain state sovereignty scope and missions.

What the Obama Administration does not want you to see

by Greta Van Susteren – from Greta Wire

There were many security cameras at the Benghazi US Consulate.  One camera was positioned to (and did) record Ambassador Stevens, on September 11, saying good night at 8:40pm Libya time to a Turkish Diplomat.

The video from this camera – I am told – shows (and proves) there was NO PROTEST outside our Consulate.  The Obama Administration had that tape immediately and they knew what it showed and knew it immediately.  Anyone who watched the video observed the obvious.

Don’t you think the Obama Administration should release that video so that the American people can see for themselves what REALLY happened and not what the Obama Administration tried to feed them in the weeks after the terrorist attack?   They won’t release the tape – in fact, they are hiding the video tape from you by classifying it so that it remains out of our reach.  Frankly, that is the oldest trick in the book – classify it.  They don’t want you to see the tape and they don’t want you to know what THEY KNEW RIGHT AWAY. (Read the rest here.)

Shortlink:

Posted by on October 27, 2012. Filed under Breaking News, Politics II. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

8 Responses to New Executive Order signed – why now? Benghazi…election?

  1. For this and many other reasons It is Time for Obama To Stand Down in This Election We need a New Leader or should I Properly say a New Servant of the People . Obama has fooled 2 many for 1 long .It is time for him to GO

  2. bill

    No,Congress is going to wait until they have no authority at all to make Obama step down, where are all the people with guts, are there any?, WEST? everyone in the US except the airheads know he has no business being the leader of our country. U.S.N

  3. Bill

    Now we understand why Obama chose Biden,Seems to me this could only happen on a divine scale. God has turned Israel, the Nation He loves over to heathens in the past,do you believe He has looked the other way for the past several years Immorality and corruption has been multiplying every day for years,read a few instances in the Bible exodus one 11-14,Ex and 2, 23-25, 2 Peter 2;19, just for new testament only believers. better get ready folks.

  4. I believe Obama will not go out of office quietly and will concoct some emergency to stay in power.. too many things have been done by his minions like Valerie Jarrett and others for him to let go now.
    His infrastructure is so deeply embedded in govt and out of it that no new president will be effective at anything but failing.
    We, as a nation, are in dire times and this administration will see to it that we stay there until they accomplish what they set out to do or fail miserably.

    Yank lll

  5. There can be no misunderstanding. bummernumbnuts has got to go. He is an illegal impeachment is only meant for duly elected officials. Bummer is in office illegaly and must be removed by force. As an American and a US Marine I demand the authorities in Washington conduct a sieze and desist order physically removing bummer from the premises.

  6. Sean

    You are a bunch of wing-nuts. What are you going to do when Obama wins the election and your paranoid right-wing fantasies don’t come true?

  7. Denise

    This comment is in reply to Sean’s above. So, hey Sean, before you assert paranoia or right wing fantasies, it may be prudent to understand the background and disciplines of those at StandUpAmerica. It would also be smart on your part to understand what Sequestration is and who the budget cuts that Obama approved will affect as it about the security of civilians. We would also like your assessment on allowing 4 Americans to die in a sovereign compound in a foreign land without so much as ground or air support, so if you think this administration cares about you, it is a fool’s errand on your part. How is that lie about the video working for you about now?

  8. er

    “These defendants now ask this Tribunal to say that they are not guilty of planning, executing, or conspiring to commit this long list of crimes and wrongs.

    They stand before the record of this Trial as bloodstained Gloucester stood by the body of his slain king;
    He begged of the widow, as they beg of you: ‘Say I slew them not.’ And the Queen replied, ‘Then say they were not slain. But dead they are…’ If you were to say of these men that they are not guilty, it would be as true to say that there has been no war, there are no slain, there has been no crime.”

    Shakespearean quote used by Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, Prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials 1945

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>